summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tex/context/sample/common/douglas.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tex/context/sample/common/douglas.tex')
-rw-r--r--tex/context/sample/common/douglas.tex23
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tex/context/sample/common/douglas.tex b/tex/context/sample/common/douglas.tex
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..838c6d24d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tex/context/sample/common/douglas.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+Donald Knuth has spent the past several years working on a
+system allowing him to control many aspects of the design
+of his forthcoming books|=|from the typesetting and layout
+down to the very shapes of the letters! Seldom has an
+author had anything remotely like this power to control the
+final appearance of his or her work. Knuth's \TEX\
+typesetting system has become well|-|known and as available in
+many countries around the world. By contrast, his
+\METAFONT\ system for designing families of typefaces has
+not become as well known or as available.
+
+In his article \quotation {The Concept of a Meta|-|Font},
+Knuth sets forth for the first time the underlying
+philosophy of \METAFONT, as well as some of its products.
+Not only is the concept exciting and clearly well executed,
+but in my opinion the article is charmingly written as well.
+However, despite my overall enthusiasm for Knuth's idea and
+article, there are some points in it that I feel might be
+taken wrongly by many readers, and since they are points
+that touch close to my deepest interests in artificial
+intelligence and esthetic theory, I felt compelled to make
+some comments to clarify certain important issues raised by
+\quotation {The Concept of a Meta|-|Font}.