diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tex/context/base/math-stc.mkvi')
| -rw-r--r-- | tex/context/base/math-stc.mkvi | 18 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tex/context/base/math-stc.mkvi b/tex/context/base/math-stc.mkvi index 2dc2b2c22..8d5b1d18f 100644 --- a/tex/context/base/math-stc.mkvi +++ b/tex/context/base/math-stc.mkvi @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ \definemathstackers [\v!bottom] [\v!mathematics] - [\c!location=\v!top, + [\c!location=\v!top, % ? \c!strut=\v!no, \c!middlecommand=\mathematics, \c!hoffset=\zeropoint] @@ -667,6 +667,22 @@ \definemathunderextensible [\v!bottom] [undertwoheadleftarrow] ["27F8] \definemathunderextensible [\v!bottom] [undertwoheadrightarrow] ["27F9] +% We don't use overline and underline. This is one of the overlooked aspects of +% unicode cq. opentype math: why treat rules different than e.g. arrows and +% accents. It is a bit unfortunate that the opportunity to move math to new +% technologies happened outside the tex domain (and/or some aspects were kept +% while in fact they were side effects of limitations of traditional fonts). +% From the unicode aware tex engines' implementation point of view things +% could have been done a bit nicer but then: the community didn't seem to care +% too much and just has to follow now. +% +% Anyhow, we use a character based approach so that at least we get unicode +% stuff in the backend (okay, we still need to deal with some cut and paste +% issues but at least we now know what we deal with. + +\definemathunderextensible [\v!bottom] [underbar] ["203E] +\definemathoverextensible [\v!top] [overbar] ["203E] + %D Some bonus ones (for the moment here): \definemathstackers |