diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/context/sources/general/manuals/metafun/metafun.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/context/sources/general/manuals/metafun/metafun.tex | 11 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/metafun/metafun.tex b/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/metafun/metafun.tex index cbbc7e3ed..8d3b513e0 100644 --- a/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/metafun/metafun.tex +++ b/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/metafun/metafun.tex @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -% language=us runpath=texruns:manuals/metafun macros=mkvi +% language=us runpath=texruns:manuals/metafun % author : Hans Hagen % copyright : PRAGMA ADE & ConTeXt Development Team @@ -32,8 +32,15 @@ % comment : Before I started updating the manual to lmtx (luametafun) I made sure that it % processed okay in the february 2021 version of lmtx. The runtime for 448 pages % (which is 20 more than the previous test) is some 16.5 seconds (just below 16 -% with compact fonts). So we can safely conclude that we're not worse off with +% with compact fonts). So we can safely conclude that we're not worse of with % respect to performance. (I use the same machine.) +% +% comment : June 31 2020, in the process of checking manuals with the runpath feature, the +% manual has 414 (some mkii and mkiv stuff has been removed) pages and processing +% takes 14.2 seconds (13.7 with compact fonts). With about 29 pps for the removed +% pages we then come to about 15.5 seconds so again we gained some (which is what +% I expect with the more efficient \LUA|-|\METAPOST\ interfacing). It also means +% that \LUAMETATEX|-|\LMTX\ is now comparable with \LUAJITTEX|-|\MKIV. % \enableexperiments[fonts.compact] |