summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex')
-rw-r--r--doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex10
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex b/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex
index a179dcb4c..71c6f997f 100644
--- a/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex
+++ b/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@
%
% mingw : 9.7
+% 20210903 : 300 pages
+%
+% mingw : 9.6
+
% But speed can differ a bit per compilation (upto .5 seconds maybe due to how
% compiled code is organized which might influence caching. Who knows ... (or
% cares). For instance at 20200407 I measured 10.9 seconds after some new low level
@@ -68,7 +72,11 @@
% switching to gcc9 it dropped again. In december 2020, with IPO enabled I crossed
% the 26 pps barrier and went below 10 seconds but that was also after some further
% cleanup in \LMTX. Mid August 2021 I measured over 30 pps but not all is due to
-% the engine I guess.
+% the engine I guess. End august we were are over 31 pps so it's not getting worse.
+
+% (This means that on a modern desktop we probably can get around 100 pps on a
+% manual like this but, always using laptops, I don't have access to machines like
+% that. A modern laptop probably could perform over 50 pps.)
% msvc 1899k (2% slower than mingw)
% msvc /GL 2297k (similar to mingw)