From a1db754014c68332a7eff39f5ff3fc2c08341f52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans Hagen Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:12:53 +0200 Subject: 2020-07-20 15:36:00 --- .../documents/general/manuals/luametatex.pdf | Bin 1366253 -> 1366640 bytes .../general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/context/documents/general/manuals/luametatex.pdf b/doc/context/documents/general/manuals/luametatex.pdf index ce773b2f0..c4b036151 100644 Binary files a/doc/context/documents/general/manuals/luametatex.pdf and b/doc/context/documents/general/manuals/luametatex.pdf differ diff --git a/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex b/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex index 60676fba0..6192c8e94 100644 --- a/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex +++ b/doc/context/sources/general/manuals/luametatex/luametatex.tex @@ -19,11 +19,18 @@ % idem overclocked f=2000/v=6 : 31.5 sec % % 20200526 : 258 pages -% mingw all in: 10.9 / rpi: 33.1 +% mingw all in: 10.9 / rpi 32 bit: 33.1 % 20200610 : 258 pages % mingw all in: 10.6 +% 20200720 : 258 pages / all in +% +% mingw : 10.6 (sometimes less) +% rpi 32 : 32.3 +% rpi 64 : 26.0 (overclocked) +% amd 10 fitlet : 28.2 + % But speed can differ a bit per compilation (upto .5 seconds maybe due % to how compiled code is organized which might influence caching. Who % knows ... (or cares). For instance at 20200407 I measured 10.9 seconds -- cgit v1.2.3