summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tex/context/sample/douglas.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tex/context/sample/douglas.tex')
-rw-r--r--tex/context/sample/douglas.tex8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tex/context/sample/douglas.tex b/tex/context/sample/douglas.tex
index 7d986d484..838c6d24d 100644
--- a/tex/context/sample/douglas.tex
+++ b/tex/context/sample/douglas.tex
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
Donald Knuth has spent the past several years working on a
system allowing him to control many aspects of the design
-of his forthcoming books, from the typesetting and layout
+of his forthcoming books|=|from the typesetting and layout
down to the very shapes of the letters! Seldom has an
author had anything remotely like this power to control the
final appearance of his or her work. Knuth's \TEX\
-typesetting system has become well|-|known and available in
+typesetting system has become well|-|known and as available in
many countries around the world. By contrast, his
\METAFONT\ system for designing families of typefaces has
-not become as well known or available.
+not become as well known or as available.
In his article \quotation {The Concept of a Meta|-|Font},
Knuth sets forth for the first time the underlying
philosophy of \METAFONT, as well as some of its products.
-Not only is the concept exiting and clearly well executed,
+Not only is the concept exciting and clearly well executed,
but in my opinion the article is charmingly written as well.
However, despite my overall enthusiasm for Knuth's idea and
article, there are some points in it that I feel might be